Civilizational Archetypes in Complex Adaptive Systems
Ψ ≥ 0.60, Low Stress, High Abstraction
Peak-performing societies with sophisticated learning systems. Examples: Singapore (1990-2020), Denmark (2000-2020)
Ψ ≥ 0.60, Low Stress, Moderate Abstraction
Reliable, consistent growth with institutional stability. Examples: Canada (1950-2020), Australia (1980-2010)
High Asymmetry, Rebuilding Phase
Post-crisis transformation with innovation potential. Examples: Germany (1945-1970), Japan (1945-1980), South Korea (1960-1990)
Cycling Moderate Stress, Dynamic Learning
Beneficial stress-driven adaptation. Examples: USA (1930-1980), UK (1940-1980), Israel (1948-1990)
Ψ 0.35-0.50, Status Quo Maintenance
Strong institutions, limited adaptability. Examples: France (1960-1990), Italy (1970-2000)
Ψ < 0.35, High Stress, Crisis Vulnerability
Destructive stress requiring intervention. Examples: Weimar Germany (1930-1933), Soviet Union (1985-1991)
Societies transition between attractors through natural evolution, crisis-driven transformation, policy-induced changes, or stress-induced degradation.